Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-03-30 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 7.41 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S24 Ultra has a global score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. The Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with Android OS, and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Galaxy S24 Ultra's body is extremely lighter and a lot thinner than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a higher pixels number per display inch, a little bit bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a way better performance than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S24 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a camera in the back with a much higher 200 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S24 Ultra's battery lifetime is just as good as Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.