Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 7.41 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 score. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and much thinner phone than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a very superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a greater pixel quantity per screen inch, a little bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations, a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 200 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) both feature really similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.