Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s score of 74.4. Samsung Galaxy S7's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's notably lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a lot better display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater count of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S7 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a bigger back camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has slightly more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.