Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 367 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a way newer cellphone than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's noticeably thicker and heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 8.0 Oreo OS (Operating System).
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). They have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a much less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a way bigger aperture and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.