Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having an 88.5 score against 74.4. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a newer device, and it's also lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Galaxy Z Flip features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bigger display, a quite higher display pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Z Flip shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture for better low light photos and video.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.