Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a 92.3 score against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a way newer phone, and it's also lighter and a little thinner than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little larger screen, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light images. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.