Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a 94.6 score against 74.4. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger screen, a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a quite better screen density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera with a way worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor and a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.