Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-06-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.69 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia 10 III is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a overall score of 83.7 against 74.4. Even though the Xperia 10 III is a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's somewhat lighter and also extremely newer. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia 10 III has the previous 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Sony Xperia 10 III counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Sony Xperia 10 III also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xperia 10 III counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xperia 10 III also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a quite greater amount of pixels in each display inch.
The Sony Xperia 10 III features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Sony Xperia 10 III captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back camera with much less MP, and they both have a 0.36 inches camera sensor, the Sony Xperia 10 III also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia 10 III, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.