Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Green and Pink |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 III is way better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a general score of 90.5 against 74.4. The Xperia 5 III is a notably newer and lighter device than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's also just a little bit thicker. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia 5 III has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xperia 5 III counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia 5 III also has 4 GB more RAM. Sony Xperia 5 III counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen, a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution.
Sony Xperia 5 III counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor. The Xperia 5 III has much more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB and 224 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features just a bit longer battery performance than Xperia 5 III, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.