Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a 78.8 score against 74.4. Despite of the fact Xperia Z4v is older and a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's design is still much lighter. These phones come with Android OS, but the Xperia Z4v has an older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Xperia Z4v has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display. The Xperia Z4v counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has slightly more storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Sony Xperia Z4v features a greater camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.