Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a global score of 88.3 against 74.4. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a noticeably thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but both of them have the same weight. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit bigger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a little better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.