Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-02-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Horizon blue and Midnight gray |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 has a score of 88.8, which is better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 score. The Xiaomi Mi 11 construction is notably newer and just a bit lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). These phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 has an older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 has a much better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a better pixels density. The Xiaomi Mi 11 counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi 11 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 11, because it has a 9% greater battery size. Xiaomi Mi 11 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 11 also has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.