Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| -- | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a score of 90.7 against 74.4. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an older 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is newer than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it is just a little bit thicker and heavier.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a much sharper display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a better pixel count per screen inch, a bit bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a battery performance that's very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.