Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | -- |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 6 has a score of 76.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. The Xiaomi Mi 6 design is newer, lighter and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). The Xiaomi Mi 6 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with more storage for applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 6 takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse image and video quality and a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.