Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with an 82.7 score against 74.4. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a way newer and just a little lighter device than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's also somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit greater pixel density, a little bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot larger sensor, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.