Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Blue, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A3 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a overall score of 79.2 against 74.4. The Xiaomi Mi A3 is a incredibly newer and somewhat lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it is a little thicker. These phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi A3 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi A3 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a bigger aperture and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera. The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.