Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s score of 74.4. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's a little lighter and much newer. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a just a bit more pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a much longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a very superior camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a much lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.