Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue and Green |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a general score of 83.8, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s general score of 74.4. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's design is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, but it is just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a just a little higher pixels count in each inch of screen, a quite larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.