Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a global score of 89, which is better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it is just a bit heavier.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite greater display pixels density, a little bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.