Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and Ceramic |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 7.7 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold is a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a 79.8 score against 74.4. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has the older 10 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold is way heavier than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's just a bit thinner and incredibly newer.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way bigger screen, a lot higher 1860 x 2480 resolution and a little bit better pixel density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) and the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold both feature very similar batteries performance, although the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold also has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.