Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a score of 84.3 against 74.4. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 construction is newer and extremely thinner than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, but it is a bit heavier. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has the older 14 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way better resolution of 2224 x 2488, a lot larger display and a little better pixel count per inch in the display. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a much powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments, a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality photographs.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.