Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an overall score of 80.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite body is a lot newer and a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, although it is somewhat thicker.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a quite larger screen. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with lot more MP. The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a greater storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.