Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s global score of 74.4. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is way newer than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's somewhat thicker and just a little heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit better display density and a little bigger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a way larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.