Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having an 87.5 score against 74.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F4 has older 12 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little larger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit better pixels density. Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco F4 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a back facing camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution, a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a little better battery life than Xiaomi Poco F4, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.