Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a score of 79.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X2 has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though Xiaomi Poco X2 is somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's a bit lighter and also much newer.
Xiaomi Poco X2 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has just a bit better display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little more pixels per display inch and a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.