Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's body is newer and a bit lighter, but also a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit larger screen, a little bit better pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a camera with a way better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a battery duration that is just as good as Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s battery duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a 0 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.