Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a general score of 77.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. These devices use Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has an older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a just a bit lighter but just a little thicker cellphone than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a much faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit bigger display, a lot higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's battery performance is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.