Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s overall score of 74.4. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a noticeably newer and just a little bit lighter device than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it is also somewhat thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.