Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a global score of 79 against 74.4. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's just a bit lighter and also a lot newer.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a battery duration that is very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.