Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is much better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having an 83 score against 74.4. These phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has older 10 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a extremely newer and just a bit lighter phone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's somewhat thicker.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little higher display pixels density, a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a much more MP camera in the back. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a battery life that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.