Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
3G Only Dual SIMGT-S7272
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 5.1 |
| 2013-06-10 | 2015-10-27 |
| 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| $ 129.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM21664 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 7.83 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is way better than Galaxy Ace 3, with a score of 74.8 against 60.8. Although the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a lot heavier than the Galaxy Ace 3, it's just a bit thinner and also incredibly newer. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has newer 5.1 version and Galaxy Ace 3 has Android 4.2.2 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Ace 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a lot greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a really bigger display.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 costs a bit more money than Galaxy Ace 3, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.