Global Score | |
62.3 | 65.8 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | Xiaomi |
Android 4.2.2 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
2013-06-10 | 2016-11-11 |
4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches | 5.51 x 2.77 x 0.33 inches |
4.06 ounces | 4.64 ounces |
Black | 16 777 216 |
-- | Metal |
$ 115.00 | $ 104.00 |
Display / Screen | |
4 inches | 5 inches |
480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
TFT | IPS LCD |
233 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
7.6 | 7.2 |
Performance | |
Broadcom BCM21664 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
8.01 | 8.28 |
Storage | |
8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
5.06 | 6.72 |
Camera | |
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
-- | f/2.20 aperture |
1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
6.71 | 8.8 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
-- | Mobile Hotspot |
LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
SIM | Micro SIM |
5.9 | 6.1 |
Battery Life | |
1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3120mAh Li - Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
8 hours talk time | -- |
3.68 | 5.12 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
GPS | GPS |
NFC | -- |
Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
-- | FM Radio |
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a has a score of 65.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy Ace 3's overall score of 62.3. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi 4a has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and Galaxy Ace 3 has Android 4.2.2, offering some extra features. Xiaomi Redmi 4a's construction is extremely newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Galaxy Ace 3.
Xiaomi Redmi 4a features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Ace 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and 2 more processing cores. Galaxy Ace 3 features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 4a, although it has a just a little worse pixel number in each inch of screen, a lot lower 800 x 480 resolution and a way smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has 8 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 4a captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a lot better (Full HD) video resolution and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4a features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a 3120mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi 4a is also the cheapest one.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.