Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
LTEGT-S7275
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 66.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-06-10 | 2020-09-20 |
| 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches | 6.13 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.22 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | Blue, Red and Titan |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM21664 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 QM215 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG K22 has an overall score of 66.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Ace 3's 62.2 global score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but LG K22 has older 10 version and Galaxy Ace 3 has Android 4.2.2. The LG K22 design is noticeably newer and thinner, but extremely heavier than Galaxy Ace 3.
The Galaxy Ace 3 has a little bit better display than LG K22, although it has a lot smaller screen, a just a little inferior pixels quantity per inch of display and a way worse 800 x 480 resolution. LG K22 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 1 GB more RAM.
The LG K22 shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a way better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a camera in the back with a much better 13 megapixels resolution. LG K22 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because although it has an external SD slot that allows up to 32 GB against 64 GB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The LG K22 counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
LG K22 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.