Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
LTEGT-S7275
| Global Score | |
| 62.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 4.0 |
| 2013-06-10 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.22 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM21664 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.9 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.68 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket has a general score of 71.5, which is better than the Galaxy Ace 3's overall score of 62.2. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version and Galaxy Ace 3 has Android 4.2.2 version. The Galaxy S III Cricket design is somewhat thinner but somewhat heavier than the Galaxy Ace 3.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a larger display, a lot better resolution of 1280 x 720 and a greater pixel density. The Galaxy S III Cricket features much more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 64 GB, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also has a much better graphics processor and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S III Cricket shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a much higher 1920x1080 video quality and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity against 1800mAh.
Galaxy S III Cricket costs the same than the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.