Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4
3GSM-G357FZ
| Global Score | |
| 60.7 | 66.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-30 | 2020-09-20 |
| 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.43 inches | 6.13 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue, Red and Titan |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 130.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 QM215 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K22 is slightly better than the Galaxy Ace 4, with a 66.3 score against 60.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the LG K22 has a more recent 10 version and Galaxy Ace 4 has Android 4.4, counting with some additional features and performance improvements. LG K22's design is notably newer and extremely thinner than Galaxy Ace 4's, but it's also much heavier.
Galaxy Ace 4 has a bit more vivid display than LG K22, although it has a way smaller display, a bit worse screen pixels density and a lot lower resolution of 800 x 480 pixels. LG K22 features just a little better performance than Galaxy Ace 4, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 1,5 GB more RAM.
LG K22 has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 32 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB internal storage capacity. The LG K22 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Ace 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.
The LG K22 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a way higher 1920x1080 video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG K22 is also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.