Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4
3GSM-G357FZ
| Global Score | |
| 60.7 | 65.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-06-30 | 2018-05-16 |
| 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.43 inches | 5.94 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 130.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 7.48 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto E5 Play is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, having a 65.5 score against 60.7. Even though the Motorola Moto E5 Play is somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, it's somewhat thinner and much newer. The Galaxy Ace 4 features a bit better screen than Moto E5 Play, although it has a lot lower resolution of 800 x 480px, a just a bit lower pixel number per inch of screen and a little bit smaller screen.
Moto E5 Play has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 256 GB and 16 GB internal storage. The Moto E5 Play counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto E5 Play has a much better camera than Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality. The Motorola Moto E5 Play counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a 2800mAh battery capacity.
The Moto E5 Play not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.