Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4
LTE 4GSM-G357FZ
| Global Score | |
| 63.7 | 68.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-30 | 2020-07-13 |
| 5.07 x 2.59 x 0.36 inches | 5.82 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 130.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 295 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.26 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2890mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Tribute Monarch is a little bit better than the Galaxy Ace 4, having a overall score of 68.6 against 63.7. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG Tribute Monarch has a more recent 10 version and Galaxy Ace 4 has Android 4.4, offering a couple nice extra features. LG Tribute Monarch's design is newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy Ace 4's, but it is somewhat heavier.
The LG Tribute Monarch has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Ace 4, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than LG Tribute Monarch, although it has a way lower pixel density, a lot smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 800 x 480.
LG Tribute Monarch counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Ace 4, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The LG Tribute Monarch captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition.
LG Tribute Monarch has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, LG Tribute Monarch is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.