Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is better than the Galaxy Alpha's general score of 76.3. The LG K92 is a heavier and thicker cellphone than the Galaxy Alpha. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but LG K92 has an older 10 version and Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Galaxy Alpha counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG K92, because although it has lesser CPU cores and 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Galaxy Alpha counts with a little more vivid display than LG K92, although it has a much smaller screen, a lot lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
LG K92 has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. The LG K92 features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1860mAh.
LG K92 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the LG K92 also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments and a lot more MP camera.
LG K92 is more expensive than the Galaxy Alpha, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.