Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha's general score of 76.3. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4. Even being the best in this comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is a incredibly thicker and notably heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy Alpha.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Galaxy Alpha counts with just a bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 720px, a just a bit lower pixels quantity per inch in the display and a way smaller display.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 1860mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a larger camera aperture, a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way higher video resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little more expensive than Galaxy Alpha, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.