Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha, having a global score of 86.3 against 76.3. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction is way heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a much larger display, a higher display density and a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 10 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger aperture to take better low light captures and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.