Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Galaxy Alpha, getting a score of 87.1 against 76.3. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version. Even being the best we compare here, Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly heavier and notably thicker phone than Galaxy Alpha.
Galaxy Alpha features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 less cpu cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a really bigger screen and a better pixels amount per inch of display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 480 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 1860mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.