Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than the Galaxy Alpha, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 76.3. The Moto G 5G Plus body is notably thicker and notably heavier than the Galaxy Alpha. Galaxy Alpha has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a really smaller screen, a way worse 1280 x 720px resolution and a bit worse number of pixels per inch of display. Moto G 5G Plus has much more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 169% more battery size. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior camera than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a way more MP back camera and a much larger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.