Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, with an 86.2 score against 76.3. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G200 5G has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version. The Motorola Moto G200 5G design is way thicker and much heavier than Samsung Galaxy Alpha.
Galaxy Alpha has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720px, a lot smaller screen and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Moto G200 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 169% greater battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger aperture and a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.