Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is much better than Galaxy Alpha's 76.3 score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy Alpha.
Samsung Galaxy Alpha features a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a lot lower 1280 x 720 pixels resolution, a just a little inferior count of pixels per display inch and a way smaller screen. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (but slower).
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a back camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy Alpha, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Alpha. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy Alpha, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.