Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) has an overall score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha's 76.3 overall score. Motorola razr (2022)'s body is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2022) has an older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version.
Galaxy Alpha counts with just a bit better display than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a much smaller display, a just a bit worse screen pixels density and a lot worse 1280 x 720 resolution. The Motorola razr (2022) has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
Motorola razr (2022) features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 1860mAh. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a better camera than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a much more mega-pixels back camera and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.