Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 15 |
| -- | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | -- |
| 4.06 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 312 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than the Galaxy Alpha, with a overall score of 79.2 against 76.3. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a thinner but noticeably heavier cellphone than the Galaxy Alpha. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an older 15 version and Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Galaxy Alpha counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a way smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 480 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Alpha counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 153% greater battery capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a larger camera aperture for better photography in low-light situations, a much higher video quality and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.