Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, getting a 90.7 score against 76.3. Even being the best we are comparing, Galaxy A52's design is way heavier and much thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha. The Galaxy Alpha features a little better performance than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Galaxy Alpha counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720px, a little bit worse pixels density and a lot smaller display. Galaxy A52 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a larger camera aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
Galaxy A52 features a very superior battery life than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 142 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.