Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has an overall score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha's overall score of 76.3. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi 9T's body is much thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy Alpha. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi 9T has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4.
Galaxy Alpha counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Galaxy Alpha features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, although it has a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720px, a little bit worse pixel amount per display inch and a really smaller screen.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a much better battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1860mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.