Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13 |
| -- | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy Alpha, getting a global score of 77.1 against 76.3. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has the older 13 version and Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's construction is notably lighter but noticeably thicker than the Galaxy Alpha.
Galaxy Alpha counts with an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Alpha, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a way bigger screen and a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light situations. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 1860mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.