Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Alpha's 76.3 general score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a a lot heavier and extremely thicker phone than the Galaxy Alpha. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version.
Galaxy Alpha counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720px, a way smaller screen and a bit less pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's processor is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Alpha one, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 170% more battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.